Wednesday, February 24, 2016

*THE REDISTRIBUTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AMERICA/THE WORLD - POSSIBLE SOLUTION TO END ALL FINANCIAL CURES*


The Initial Thought of Redistributing Wealth: 


A series of events had just occurred as newspaper articles had flashed through my mind throughout these past years. We have heard the saying "that the rich are becoming richer, and the poor are becoming poorer." 

Though I have been a capitalist all my life, and I believe in the American dream. I still believe that we should help each other especially when politicians define our tax laws; therefore, how much we keep in our pocket. 

This can be unfair, because people that work hard all their lives never get ahead. It is troubling to think that someone that works fifty hours a week, which can be same amount of time that a CEO works never receives the right direction, as that of a business person, who earns tens times the amount of somebody that works the same amount of hours that they do. 

It seems education between the poor class and middle class is different than the rich. Furthermore, it bears resemblance that most billionaires have an inheritance that they can pass onto their children. Those wealthy children will never understand the meaning of sacrifice and hard work because they never understood what it meant to work for their inheritance as did their ancestors. 

If the rich can give a head start to their children, why can't we redistribute the commonwealth of America to the poor allowing the poor to attain their dreams and retire comfortably? 

This last thought poked at me as I pondered about these dated events, and articles that I have read.

March 2015

Many financial experts have quoted that it takes a nest egg of at least 1 million dollars to retire comfortably. However, that depends upon your means of living and where a person lived. There are other factors that come into play as to how long 1 million dollars would help a person, but it is for certain that comfortable retirement would take about 1 million to 2 million dollars. 

This is further discussed by one of the largest retirement companies in America, AARP. Their article can be found here:

"SAVING ENOUGH FOR RETIREMENT"



8th December 2015


The Power Ball was close to a 1 billion dollars, and people were starting to get anxious about the jackpot. I saw many customers coming in buying at least 50 tickets with the hope that it will increase their chances of winning. Some were paying at least 100 dollars worth in tickets. 

I was beyond disbelief that certain people would be this desperate to win. I had just started work for the day at the local Loaf 'N Jug store. As I saw these customers buy each ticket, I wondered to myself what would people do with that amount of money? Some people didn't even know what to do with a large amount, let alone fathom that amount. 

There was one customer that I shared a personal opinion that may be God has a reason as to why certain people aren't rich, which this person agreed. But, there was one customer that started making me think especially when he only bought one ticket. 

I then proceeded to ask him why he had only bought one ticket, he turned and smiled at me; and said, "If we were to redistribute the 1 billion dollar jackpot, and gave the American people at least 1 million dollars we would end poverty."

I then asked, "How would that end poverty?"

Customer, "Because there are at least 325 million people in America.Well, you all have a nice day." Still smiling as he walks out of the store.

I was taken aback by his answer. 

24 February 2016

Actress Eliza Dushku posted a Facebook video about the wealth of America. This is what she states in her video: 

Final Thoughts:


There are more than 500 billionaires in the entire world. Back in the early 2000s, my local newspaper, The Register Guard, noted that if we were to total the world's billionaires wealth it would equal 1.1 trillion dollars. Give 7 billion people at least 1 million dollars, we would have more than enough money for each billionaire while allowing people a head start towards their futures - reeducate people about money as the wealthy teach their children (the children who already have a advantageous head start over other individuals in the world). 

Here in America it would give the chance for Americas to invest into their futures while allowing them a head start to retiring comfortably. Furthermore, the homeless on the street would be able to buy a house and buy decent clothing thus allowing them to pass job interviews. Though 1 million dollars is a lot of money, it isn't enough to make the rich fall from their tax brackets. After all, the rich would still have to provide jobs allowing the poor class and middle class to make up for the missing money towards that ideal retirement. 

Though the idea may sound ideal, I know that there are other people who wouldn't take advantage of this opportunity - i.e. gamble or spend it lavishly- at least the rich wouldn't be at fault for their actions - since people do have their agency. It isn't up for us to decide what people do with their money, but it is up to us to help other people. 

The question that I would like to ask is this - is it an ethical way to help people? And, what would be the repercussions to giving people at least 1 million dollars?

And, could this end financial cures if the wealthy gave away their wealth? 

Just my thoughts on possibly ending the financial cures of the world, and the United States of America. 

Thursday, February 11, 2016

*DISCLAIMER: MY PRESIDENTIAL PREDICTION - YOUR CONCERN*

MY PRESIDENTIAL PREDICTION: MY FEAR


i once quoted that I would exercise my right to vote this coming election year, but I don't know if I should vote seeing the candidates that will be available this election. I haven't had the time to follow this election year, but I have enough of an idea to know what is going on - I wish I was able to follow a little bit more closely seeing I am limited in technology right now. However, I not the one to follow the status quo. For example, when Mitt Romney was the Republican Presidential Candidate - most Mormons voted for him because he is Mormon - I didn't vote for him; and chose to vote for Barack Obama - even though I am a registered Republican. Though it is disheartening to say, the least, I think Donald Trump is going to be the president this 2017. How did I come to this conclusion?


Placing aside current polls, and crazy antics, Donald Trump has had a following for president since the early 1990s. If anybody has read his books especially the book called: "The America We Deserve", which came out in the early 2000s, he has described the current state of America; and how he could change the United States of America. It describes in detail the political issues America faced then - just before the 9/11 attack. Though it has been over 10 years since I have read the book, he has a charismatic approach towards creating America a great country; well aware of the political issues that America faces. Since some of Trump's books has been addressed to making America great again, it has caused many of his followers to increase for quite some time - growing in numbers over the last two decades. Though I support Donald Trump as a business person, I do NOT support him as president.


Again, I predict that Donald Trump will be president. Does anybody agree that Trump will be president this election - placing your personal feelings aside? If not, who do you think will be president this coming election; and why? I am interested in everyone's viewpoints, and I do respect them!


Interesting fact: 

Since Dwight D. Eisenhower's time (over 60 years ago), the presidents have alternated between parties from Democrat to Republican - I am not counting presidents that have served two terms. Since history has shown it, there bears a further conclusion that the public tends to follow the times and status quo of what they want rather than what the people need.


For example,
  • After World War II, Dwight D. Eisenhower got the vote because he was a war hero - serving as one of the primary generals during World War II. 
  • The economy went sour allowing Reagan to enter the White House. 
  • 9/11 struck, and the public chose George W. Bush, a Republican. Just these examples alone show that the public goes by what it wants rather than what it needs. 

Are you "the" public?

This is my fear. Your concern. Choose wisely.